Science Fiction Has Gotten A Little…Gay.
This is going to be another touchy subject so let’s all promise to be on our best behavior right out of the gate? If not, I’m prepared to throw down, if you know what I mean.
*smacks a riding crop menacingly into the palm of his hand*
Good. Now that we’re all reading the same book, let’s get on the same page by giving you a bit of my own background. I’ve lived in Oakland, CA for the past four years. Before that I lived in Minneapolis, MN. This is important because these two cities (If you include San Francisco into the conversation alongside Oakland) are like two super LGBT capitols of the world. So I come from a microcosmic world of LGBT acceptance.
This skews my perspective.
In addition, one of my sisters is dating another woman (Huzzah! I like women too, welcome to the club dear sister). I don’t really know if that makes her gay, or bi, or what… and honestly I don’t really care to define it. As long as she’s happy, I’m happy. Not everything needs a label.
I certainly don’t. I don’t want to be known as Anthony the straight guy. That’s so…restrictive and disingenuous and trying to fit me nice and neat into a box that most certainly cannot accommodate my girthy hips.
Sexuality falls along a spectrum. We’re all a little gay and we’re all a little straight. Accept that. Does that make you uncomfortable? Well, too bad. That’s your baggage, not mine.
But I will say this: If that previous assertion does make you a little uncomfortable, you should probably do some soul searching and figure out why that is because the world of tomorrow is coming and you’re falling behind the times. The rest of us aren’t gonna slow down and wait for you either.
So, in light of everything I just said, here’s what’s bothering me: Locus Magazine recently announced the shortlist for Best Sci-Fi and Best Fantasy book of 2014.
Best Sci-Fi
The Peripheral – William Gibson
Ancillary Sword – Ann Leckie
The Three-Body Problem – Cixin Liu
Lock In – John Scalzi
The Southern Reach Trilogy – Jeff Vandermeer
Best Fantasy
The Goblin Emperor – Katherine Addison
Steles of the Sky – Elizabeth Bear
City of Stairs – Robert Jackson Bennett
The Magician’s Land – Lev Grossman
The Mirror Empire – Kameron Hurley
I don’t know how many of these, if any, you’ve read, but I’ve read 8 of the 10 books (Excluding The Magician’s Land–cause I didn’t really enjoy the first book in this series–and Steles of the Sky) and I noticed something really interesting: they all have a gay character.
I’ll get to why that stuck out to me as being odd a little bit later, but I want to draw attention to some of the praise these books received:
“They fell in love at a university in Saypur, but Vo turned out to be gay (Shara suspects he liked her boyish figure.” – City of Stairs – Robert Jackson Bennett
“Annihilation has an Asian lead character, Authority a Latino and Acceptance has a gay man as protagonist.“ – Southern Reach Trilogy – Jeff Vandermeer
“One of the characters is gay, and it’s A Very Big Deal in the way his history is presented.” – The Goblin Emperor – Katherine Addison
“Those aren’t the reasons I’m falling so hard for this book. A big part of the reason is this: there are two characters, Jim Buchold and Rick Wisson, who are MARRIED. Yep. You got it. Two guys, married.“ – Lock In – John Scalzi
“One of the main characters is gay. You don’t see a whole lot of homosexuality in fantasy, and you should …. One of them is sexually promiscuous. One of them is depressed. There’s a kind of range of psychological personalities that is a little bit broader than what you see in standard fantasy.” – The Magician’s Land – Lev Grossman
“Gibson’s inclusion of gay characters as a regular part of Clanton’s community is commendable, and merits remark until such inclusion is no longer remarkable.” – The Peripheral – William Gibson
This is what bugs me. We are still acting, as a community, as though the inclusion of gay characters in popular Sci-Fi and Fantasy is somehow…cutting edge. I don’t know if Steles of the Sky has any gay characters, but every other book on the list does. That’s 9 out of 10, which is like…90 percent or something.
Those are insanely high numbers. Now, you may be thinking that I’m somehow upset by this fact, but hey, I have gay characters in my own Firstborn Saga so it’s not like I’m petitioning for them to be removed.
Actually, I’m not sure what I’m petitioning for, because on the one hand I think it’s fantastic that the LGBT community is getting the inclusion they deserve–they are getting stories where, FINALLY, they get to be the hero–but the paradigm is shifting in a weird, unexpected way in that the LGBT community is now being…over-represented.
Huh? You all grunt as a collective.
Alright, don’t burn me at the stake quite yet, hear me out.
The National Center for Health Statistics does an annual National Health Interview Study and recently they began surveying Americans’ sexual orientation and what they found is that about 3.8 percent of American’s identify as gay/lesbian/bi/transgender. I’ll be the first to point out that there are some significant methodological issues with this survey.
– A lot of people don’t feel comfortable reporting one way or the other.
– A lot of people who participate in same-sex relations don’t identify themselves as gay, ie: “I sleep with men, but I’m not gay.” Huh? That… that is confusing. I agree, but remember, sexuality is a spectrum.
Anyways, I’m willing to grant that 3.8 percent is probably on the low end, so let’s round up to a solid 10%. Okay, so that means 10% of the population is represented in 90% of the Locus Award Eligible Novels for Sci Fi and Fantasy.
That’s INSANE (in both a good and a bad way). It’s good because I think gay rights is a super hot button topic right now. It’s good that writers are bringing awareness to this and being inclusive in their writing.
The bad side of the equation is that now, to write an award winning book, it almost feels like you have to include a gay character. As a result, everything is feeling a little.. same. A little.. forced.
Here’s an example of something else that affects ten percent of the population: Diabetes (which incidentally is the seventh leading cause of death in America). Now, imagine that 9 out of those 10 books all had a character suffering from Diabetes, and that a percentage of them even died from said disorder.
That’d be a little weird, right?
How about mental disorders? Hell, we could focus entirely on Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder which together affect over 10 percent of the population. Include all mental disorders and you’re looking at closer to 25 percent of the population.
Okay, I guess if I had to state my gripe, it would be this: We’ve thrown open the doors of inclusivity, but by doing so we’ve pigeonholed ourselves to the singular character trait expressed in terms of sexuality.
I am not defined by my sexuality any more than my sister is. If the character in the book your reading is, then we’ve got a problem. We’re doing something wrong.
There is a caveat to this and it was mentioned in one of those reviews up above. Let me scamper up there and grab that real quick… hold tight.
*puts on some elevator music*
“One of the characters is gay, and it’s A Very Big Deal in the way his history is presented.” – The Goblin Emperor – Katherine Addison
When introducing a character and making a point of their sexuality, it has got to serve a purpose. If it doesn’t, then your character is a blatant attempt at ticking boxes on your Diversity and Demographics checklist.
Let’s leave off with this:
“Gibson’s inclusion of gay characters as a regular part of Clanton’s community is commendable, and merits remark until such inclusion is no longer remarkable.” – The Peripheral – William Gibson
The long, drawn out point I’m trying to make is this: the inclusion of gay characters, in and of itself, is no longer remarkable. It just isn’t.
Or is it?
*shrug*
Honestly, I just thought it was really cool how many awesome books are including gay characters these days and wanted to push your buttons to draw attention to that fact. Sucker! You’ve been had!
Anthony, you could say the same thing about movies and TV shows, exactly the same thing. Maybe it’s a phase – we went through this with the inclusion of African Americans in movies and TV. You are to young to remember the movie Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967). Katherine Houghton brought her fiance, Sidney Poitier, home to meet her parents, Spencer Tracey and Katherine Hepburn. Oh, the daring! A movie about an interracial couple! Now its mundane. I think this too shall pass.
I remember watching the movie and thinking, “What’s the big deal?” There was a remake of that not too long ago called “Guess Who?” with Ashton Kutcher going to meet his African American girlfriends family. Same tired old trope.
I can’t wait until this becomes mundane and we can turn our attention to topics that actually matter beyond who sleeps with who.
It’s a hot topic, much like Zombies is (or was recently), a hot topic. It sells. Well written post, I liked it.
Ooh, that gives me an idea. Gay zombies. Can you say instant best seller?
It would be nice if we were at a point where inclusion of a gay character was met with neither fanfare nor disgust. It’s people, having relationships that in some cases include sex. It’s not revolutionary. But I suppose in an effort to portray the “socially enlightened world of the future” many authors (gay or straight) are going to want to cram their writing with how they think things should be. The science fiction that comes to us from the 60s and 70s is full of “progressive” sexual concepts that don’t always add much to the plot, but do reflect the zeitgeist. Out of curiosity, among the books that you’ve read from that list, how many of them are guilty of doing what you call ticking the diversity box?
I think you’re right about this particular topic reflecting the zeitgeist of the current generation. I eagerly await the day we can move past it, though. Neither fanfare or disgust would be lovely!
I’d say 4 of the books on the list were merely ticking the diversity box. There’s a 5th that I waffle on, and another one that simply went so willy-nilly on gender relations and sexuality that the whole thing is one big diversity checklist.
On the whole, however, all the books on that list are really good and certainly deserving of being where they are.
I strongly suspect a lot of today’s “enlightened” folk don’t actually have any principles of their own, so they cling to whatever is seen as “enlightened”, and try to demonstrate how “enlightened” they are at every turn (or every word they write) lest they be cast into the outer darkness. It’s like religious fanaticism with social issues as deity.
Hold on. You’re straight? I’m a little disappointed, if I’m honest. There goes my Anthony and the Mountain King fantasy. That said, eyes up here, dude.
I agree, there does seem to be a “Let’s throw in a token gay guy.” mentality lately. It’s not just Sci Fi though. I’ve seen it on tv and in movies as well. Though, it would be nice if gay characters would stop being treated like comic relief or a minor subplot. Aside from Will And Grace, I can’t think of a lot of gay main characters. Then again, I haven’t had cable in like three years and I don’t watch a lot of anything that doesn’t have Ken Burns’ name on it. You’d think I’m joking. Not even a little. If anyone wants to start a Ken Con, drop me a line, I already have a black, plastic wig.
I’m arguing that the trend of including gay people needs to be pushed a little farther. Aside from Brokeback Mountain, I can’t think of a major motion picture that featured gay main characters. Well, there was that Alan Turing movie that I can’t recall the name of but I’d like to see a movie where the gayness of the main character wasn’t presented as almost a fetish or a mark against them. You know, maybe the character is gay AND a hobbit or a sniper. Like, they’re gay but that’s just normal and they’re trying to find all the horcruxes. Or, gasp! A real, gay romance. Like, Sleepless in Seattle, but with dudes. Where, gay people were presented as normal, dealing with normal romantic ups and downs.
I also find it off-putting if gay sex is used or presented as something unusual or outrageous to make a society or character seem more “advanced” or “alternative”. “Hey, look! The people on Planet Jeff like to poke each other in the butt! Isn’t that edgy and fun?” No. A lot of people on Earth already do that. Have been since… people realized they had butts, with holes in them. And something to poke in said hole. I think it is interesting that some authors are defining the civilizations and characters they’re creating by the way they have sex. Is it because they feel it’s so central to the core of a person’s identity or is it a way to make a character stand out?
I don’t read a lot of Sci Fi. Sorry! I mainly limit it to stuff my friends have written so I can’t really comment effectively on how widespread the trend is or if the books listed above use their gays well. But, from the comments, it seems like the gay thing is used as a gimmick and that feels a little cheap. And, what if, someone writes something with the right kind of gay character and it’s just epic but readers roll their eyes and go “Ugh… Not another gay space cop! Pass.”?
Reblogged this on bawdybookwriter and commented:
An interesting and entertaining examination on the inclusion of gay characters in modern Science Fiction.
Hmmm so the new ‘normal’ is being ‘a little gay’?
Well… I have always been an oddball, why stop now…
[…] AV: Why Ratings and Review Don’t Matter Anymore! (sort of) and Science Fiction Has Gotten A Little…Gay […]
[…] trad-published (a point of view that nearly 80% of US consider themselves to hold) than for example gay ones. (no, I have no problem with them being published, and I don’t hate them. Or fear them. But […]