A good story needs at least one of two things: a good plot or good characters. Ideally you’d get both, but beggars can’t be choosers. Well, actually, they can…but they shouldn’t. For instance, if you’re panhandling outside Chipotle and I bring you a chicken burrito, I don’t want to hear any complaints about how you’re a vegetarian or gluten free.

beggars

Take my damned burrito and be thankful. Consequently, that is one of my more popular pick-up lines. It’s never worked, but it makes me giggle.

Anyways, we’re skidding out of control and getting dangerously off topic here, so let’s focus, yeah? Good, stop blowing bubbles with your spittle and listen up. We’ve talked previously about generating ideas for your stories (Don’t remember? Figures… click here), and I can’t comment on whether or not you’ll drudge up a great plot from that exercise, but you’ve got a start in the right direction so keep going and eventually you’ll stumble out of the wilderness.

Or atleast, that’s the hope.

So, let’s talk about writing good characters now and suss out what exactly that even means. The title of this post is “Writing Likable Characters” but that’s sort of misleading because characters don’t actually have to be likable. They can be despicable.

If we loathe them for all the right reasons. When done correctly, it sucks us into the story like we’re watching a train wreck of horrible, no hope of turning away. In this case, our characters is doing a good job, he’s a good character.

Some writers claim that there has to be something redeemable about your character, something the reader can latch onto, a source of similarity from which a sympathetic relationship can spawn. Those writers are absolutely….correct, to a point!

We’ll use Darth Vader here for a quick example. He starts off as this mass-murdering sociopath (a role he never really grows out of), but by the end of the original Star Wars trilogy we understand him a bit better, and ultimately we relate to him based on the sacrifice he makes to save Luke.

darth vader

Conversely, the Joker, from the Batman series, is a mass-murdering sociopath who we, as the reader, have a hard time understanding and commiserating with. He’s a terrifying villain for precisely the same reasons that the Alien from Aliens is, it’s because they’re so foreign to us. So unrelatable.

That makes them great for the role they play in the story, but ultimately we don’t really care what happens to them. We aren’t invested in their story, and truth be told, we’re just rooting against them the majority of the time.

A quick counterpoint to that would be Two-Face, Harvey Dent, from the Batman universe, who is a mass-murdering sociopath, but with a back story we can sympathize with. Given the correct circumstances, it’s not so hard imagining any one of us becoming the horrible monster that is Two-Face.

Eh, maybe he's got a point?

Eh, maybe he’s got a point?

And that’s what you’re looking for in a good villain. A terrifying persona that we can empathize with. Those are the ones that really get under our skin. Think back to Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker; the majority of Luke’s struggle in the second movie is an internal one as he fights against what he could so easily become.

We all have monsters lurking inside of us, and I think this is the launching off point for writing a good, likable character. Even the good-guys have inner demons they’re constantly fighting against. When those demons are rooted in the real world, when they are issues any of us could struggle against, then we have a sympathetic character.

That right there is a huge take-away; you’re character needs to be sympathetic. If they aren’t, then they are probably a caricature, possibly of evil (the Joker), or they are boring.

Readers don’t want boring.

hungry bored

One of the most despicable characters of any story I’ve ever read is Gully Foyle from The Stars My Destination by Alfred Besser. This guy murders, rapes, and pillages. In general, he’s a horrible human being. A dubious starting point for any main character. Even worst, he’s unrepentant. He doesn’t even feel bad about what he is.

the stars

He is so consumed by a perceived injustice against his person that he will literally stop at nothing to have his revenge. As a reader we understand his single-minded focus, perhaps from a slightly removed position that makes it hard to relate to his actions, but we get it.

Now, the thing about Gully is that eventually he realizes the horror of his ways, grows a conscience, and seeks to make amends. Which is probably the most important aspect of writing a good, likable character: they need to grow.

If by the end of a story the main character hasn’t changed, hasn’t learned from their actions, then the reader will be upset, and deservedly so.

A famous writers, who’s name I can’t recall, once said that the story you’re writing should be the most important event in the life of your main character up to that point. If it’s not, then you’re telling the wrong story. With that in mind, if you reach the end of your story and your character hasn’t changed, or grown, in an appreciable way, then you’ve done something wrong.

Life changes us. Ignoring that fact is a surefire way to write a lame character.

life changing event

How is your character growing as the story goes on? You need to ask yourself this question often, because in a lot of ways it’ll serve as an internal guide for your story.

Writing likable characters is not about them saying the right thing, or doing the right thing. As individuals we rarely say, or do, the right thing. But we try. And that’s an important takeaway, your character needs try. They try to do the right thing, and they fail. They try to do the wrong thing and they succeed. One way or another they are not static participants in the world you’ve created, pushed around by destiny’s broom.

They are active agents for change, which is what we as readers can relate too. We want to be agents of change in our own lives, but often that feels impossible. We’re stuck at our jobs, or tethered to the mistakes of our past, our families need us in a way that stifle our sense of self and individuality. These are real struggles we all encounter and can relate too.

So, take your characters and ground them in the familiar, root their struggles in the relatable, and then show how they resist. How they try to outgrow their circumstances.

Do they always succeed? No, that would be disingenuous. Sometimes they fail, and that can make for just as great of a story.

Alright, so get down to the comments and tell me, what are some of your favorite characters and why? Who are some of your least favorite characters and why?

Anthony

11 Comments

  1. Ted Cross on January 28, 2015 at 5:19 pm

    I remember when Star Wars first came out (Yeah, I’m old), and everyone loved Darth Vader even when he had no sympathetic elements yet. He was HUGE in all the conversations going on at the time. Doesn’t mean you are wrong, but as I was reading your post it brought back those memories so I thought I’d better comment!

    • AntVicino on January 28, 2015 at 5:24 pm

      Yeah, it’s true, as a culture we enjoy totally bad-ass villains, which is why Joker is so popular. We’d probably love Darth Vader, too, even if he’d continued on his sociopathic trajectory. But it’s a hollow love. Sauron is straight evil and nobody really cares when he is destroyed. Whereas we feel kind of bad when Vader gets crispy-fied.

  2. Human Interest on January 28, 2015 at 5:27 pm

    Reblogged this on Human Interest.

  3. Travellinginmybookcase on January 28, 2015 at 5:31 pm

    Really great blog post 🙂

    • AntVicino on January 28, 2015 at 5:42 pm

      Thanks, I’m glad you enjoyed it!

  4. Shauna on January 28, 2015 at 6:26 pm

    So very true. If characters are too perfect and always succeed they are BORING. And if they are constantly looking for the bad/evil options just because they can, they’re tiresome.

  5. fredthethread on January 28, 2015 at 7:12 pm

    What a great article – its all good advice.

    Its weird to write but I did fall in love with a character, it sent me a bit crazy and I wasn’t the only one! It was Edward from Twilight, (its a shameful confession I know) but it tapped into the idealistic teenager I was years ago I was in my forties when I read them! That hero who loves you, protects you from evil, Love that has to survive obstacles face danger with a core group of loyal supportive friends. You just don’t really get that in modern life. I also found the female character Bella one of the most irritating characters I have ever come across – she did not really value the same things I did so I found it hard to relate to her or perhaps I was just a teeny bit jealous! lol. The books weren’t literary tomes, but the character really got to me. So much so I read all four books in four days and had to drive through snow to get the last book! It was the biggest book hangover of my life. However, I don’t really want to re-read them and the love affair has long since faded.

    In contrast I adore Scott Fitzgerald’s writing but I find his characters so shallow that I gave up reading the Beautiful and Dammed, yes they might be going through some sort of growth but it was so slow in coming I just did not care enough to carry on. He writes such beautiful descriptions that I found I would read sentences again and again which slowed the pace. The Great Gatsby is a better book, but the characters aren’t that likeable – and Daisy was not worthy of him, I wanted a better ending. All his female characters were unlikeable and irritating, without depth but then that was his experience and he wanted to expose the shallowness of the age.

    I have been reading a lot of Liane Morriaty, I find she is gripping because I relate instantly to her characters – their flaws (unlike me of course!), but she takes a familiar ordinary setting, like a primary school, and weaves an extra ordinary event – like murder or stalking. I found the Husband’s Secret was compelling because I did not know how she was going to make the situation come out well.

    Ok, I think I have rambled on enough! I enjoy your blog, it stimulates the grey cells what I have of them.

  6. Laissez Faire on January 28, 2015 at 11:27 pm

    Maleficent — when I was a little girl I was in awe. Strong and powerful. Evil yes, but in an old book I had she had a bit more reason to be grumpy. Lestat from The Vampie Lestat. Ayla from Clan of the Cave Bear (only up until the Plains of Passage — after that the author just gave up and wrote material not worthy of a dung beetle). Mr. Spock — goes without saying. The deaf guy from The Stand (I was mad at Stephen King for a month for killing him off). Sheldon from the Big Bang Theory — because he makes you want to choke him, but you can’t because he’s oblivious like a loyal dog who keeps chewing your shoes.

  7. dadachuck on January 30, 2015 at 10:27 am

    Great post! Very informative and insightful. I think you know when your characters are well written; they begin to take over the story and do their own things!

    • AntVicino on January 30, 2015 at 4:00 pm

      Very true. When they start running off and causing trouble on their own, that’s when you’ve found a character with some agency!

  8. […] Here’s a link over to that post, by the way. I’M A LINK! CLICK ME! […]

Leave a Comment