Creating imaginary worlds filled with whatever weirdness your thinking noodle cooks up is, at it’s root (if you’re doing it correctly) fun. Sure, sometimes it’s hard forcing yourself into the chair to put words to paper, but once you’re in the flow and ideas start plopping out of your word-hole, the act of writing becomes a fairly fun activity.

Some people write because they have a syphilitic story-burn in their nether regions. They have a story chewing at their insides, begging to be loosed upon the world. If they don’t somehow manage to expel said story, it will literally consume them. Or so that’s how they feel.

Personally, I’m not one of those writers. I don’t have a Magnum Opus roiling about inside me. Nothing clamoring to crawl out of me. I just love stories. Whether it’s telling my own, or losing myself in somebody else’s, there is nothing in this world I enjoy more than a good story.

So when it comes to writing, sitting down and churning out a first draft ain’t no thang but a chicken wang (<– obligatory peculiar phrase for the day). Unfortunately, first draft’s are rarely any good. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that 99% of first drafts are abominations which is why most are thrown into a hyena pit and left for dead.

Which is too bad. Who knows how many great stories the world has been denied simply because the author didn’t sit down and do that most painful of steps: Edits.

I can’t remember who said it, but this gets to the gist of it:

Great Writers Are Great Rewriters.

Editing sucks, not least because it means descending into the literary depths of our current Masterpiece of shi—and absolutely eviscerating it, but because most of people simply don’t know where to begin in the editing process.

Literary gold awaits you down there...and bats. Definitely bats.

Literary gold awaits you down there…and bats. Definitely bats.

You’ve spent days, weeks, months, years, perhaps even decades, getting that first draft out. The words are one jumbled mess sprawled across hundreds of pages and you simply don’t know where to begin. Figuring out where to begin can be so difficult that most people simply give up. Of those people who stick it out, I’m afraid that a vast majority of them go about the editing process in the least efficient way conceivable.

What I see most often are writers diving back into their first drafts without any clear path or course of action. They read the story from beginning to end correcting commas and unruly apostrophes, minor word changes and occasionally editing a sentence for clarity. By the time they reach the end they’ll have done a significant amount of work, but none of it productive.

This is important, so it bares (bears? Someone help, homonyms are hard) repeating: They are doing a significant amount of work, but none of it productive.

Let’s use an analogy:

You’re driving along Highway 1 in your Miata. The top is down and your flowing mane of hair is blowing along with the ocean breeze. It’s a beautiful day: the sun is shining, birds are chirping, you have a little Jason Mraz blaring through the speakers. But then the unthinkable happens, the engine starts sputtering. The chassis shakes uncontrollably and now smoke is billowing out through the hood.

You pull over, because while you don’t know much about cars, you know smoke is bad. Besides, it totally smells bad and is stinging your eyeballs.

Now you’re on the side of the road, poor Miata refuses to go any further. You pop the hood and take a look inside, but your car know-how ends somewhere between “put gas in gas hole when Empty light comes on” and “smoke is bad”. You’re looking at the overheated engine, but you don’t have a clue what’s wrong or where to begin.

So what do you do?

*shrug*

Depends on what sort of person you are. Maybe you grab a chamois and Armor-All and start buffing your car’s paint. Maybe you pour some oil in the oil-hole while pretending to be Zorro with the dipstick. Hell, maybe you get the car jack out and change one of the tires.

Now, perhaps your tires are bald and it really is time to change them. But has your engine suddenly picked up a smoking addiction on account of a flat tire? Probably not.

But this is what I see writers doing with their manuscripts all the time. They start fixing random things that probably do need to be fixed, but aren’t the main priority.

Case in point: there is little to be gained by giving your Miata a car wash if you never manage to get it running again.

I’ve dragged this analogy out too long, let’s get concrete.

How To Be More Effective With Your Edits

Before you can engage in any sort of meaningful edits, you have to diagnose your stories problems. After finishing your first draft, put it aside for a couple weeks to gain time, distance, independence, a modicum of sanity and perspective.

spae

After a suitable cooling down period, return to the manuscript and read that sucker from beginning to end as quickly as possible. On this read through you’re trying to cram the whole story into your brain at the same time and see if it actually makes sense, noting the really big changes it’s going to need along the way.

For instance, by the end of this read through you might have taken a handful of notes that look like this:

-Billy Jean needs more characterization

-Suzy’s sex change isn’t foreshadowed enough

-Joey chapters make me want to gouge my eyeballs out with dull pencils

-Archibald’s stripper-for-hire subplot doesn’t really fit with this Young Adult book

Notice these are pretty big/general changes. You can’t just go to page 134 and fix the problem. For most of these you’ll have to sprinkle new scenes and details across the entirety of the book like the Fairy Godmother of Diabetes with powdered sugar.

You have these really big issues you need to work out, right? Good, before working them out. Read the book again, this time slowly and critically. Note the places where you could squeeze more characterization in. Circle the places to cut out Archi’s stripping career.

The goal of this second read is not to add new material. It’s to refine your plan of attack so that your editing on the third read through can be as surgical as possible.

Identify the BIG/GENERAL problems your story faces before worrying about the little things like sentence structure, language, and grammar.

Why?

Because it’s a waste of time to make sentences sparkle if they are only going to be cut later on (as is the case with Archibald for example). Save yourself time and energy by locating your stories big problems first and then whittle them down.

In my own writing I keep track of all the editing I need to do in a journal with three columns. One for big changes, medium changes, and small changes. Always tackle the big changes first. Here’s an example from my journal to give you an idea:

Editing

All that, by the way, is for a 30,000 word Novella. Which goes to show that your work is only just beginning after you’ve completed the first draft.

Once you’ve diagnosed your story problems, pick them off one by one, starting at the top and moving your way down. The nice thing about this method is that as you get deeper into the edits, the easier the fixes become. It adds a sense of progress and direction that might otherwise be lacking.

After crossing everything off your list, go for another read thru and create ANOTHER list. This time paying attention to whether or not your original fixes actually work. Sometimes by trying to fix a problem you make it worse, sometimes you don’t go quite far enough and you need to slap a little more duct tape on there.

Whatever the case may be, you need to keep repeating this process until YOU as the author can no longer find any glaringly obvious problems. Then comes the painful part: Send it to your beta readers and editor. Get as many sets of eyeballs on your story as possible.

You’ll be surprised by just how much you missed. Don’t feel bad about that, it’s part of the process. We all do it. Take the feedback from your readers/editor, ignore the stuff you don’t agree with, and dive back in for another round of edits.

This is your structural edit and it is, by far, the most difficult part of the editing process. But once you get all the cogs in place and the engine turning over, it’s smooth sailing. All that’s left is a nice little polish.

For this, I go through, reading each and every sentence very, very carefully, paying attention for word usage, clarity, and originality.

Clarity is obvious, right? Make sure the sentence is saying what you intend for it to say.

Originality is obvious, too, but it’s hard to be… objective and honest with yourself. We all know to avoid cliches, right? Of course. But what’s even more insidious are personal turns of phrases that we subconsciously fall back on. For me, I love using the phrase “Hugged him like a baby koala.”

koala

You’d be surprised how often I find an opportunity to throw that sentence into my works. Problem is I’ve used it in one of my stories and it’s a memorable enough line that if I ever use it again the astute reader will call foul.

I know this because my beta reader caught me trying to sneak my baby koala sentence into Mind Breach. Whoops.

Word usage is tricky and comes down to personal preference. In my fiction I hate using the same word multiple times in the same paragraph. In fact, I go so far as to avoid using the same word multiple times on the same page.

Why? Because it draws attention to itself and pulls the reader out of the story.

By the way, I’m not just talking about big show-offy words like indubitably or inexorably, which we all know to avoid overusing. I’m talking about really simple shit like:

“Bob walked over to the table where Kate sat reading her newspaper. She looked up from her newspaper and scowled. Bob circled the table before taking a seat. A bowl sitting on top of the table jangled as he sat spilling milk onto the newspaper in front of Bob.”

I’m being really obvious with the words I’m trying to overuse here, but the thing is, I’m not really exaggerating. This type of paragraph crops up all the time in new writer’s fiction. I hate it and you should hate it.

Avoid it like the plague.

Use your word processors Find Keyword function and whenever you notice certain words cropping up more than seems natural, search it out and annihilate it.

If you could only do one exercise before releasing your Kraken’esque manuscript into the world, it would be this: Read it Out Loud.

Everybody should do this at least once with their draft, perhaps even twice if you’re anal like me. Reading the words out loud lets our ears pick up on things that our mind would have otherwise glossed over. Stilted dialog stands out like a sore thumb and wandering exposition slaps you in the face like a wet towel.

Doesn’t that sound like a hoot? Sure does, now go do it.

At the very end of my editing process, I go through and use that Find Keyword functionality to search out this list of commonly overused words. I look at each instance of the word and decide on an individual basis whether or not the word actually needs to be there. If so, fine. If not?

cut it out

Here’s the list I use:

OVERUSED WORDS

Cause, As, Was, However, Though, Actually, Really, Likely, Of Course, As Well, Perhaps, Probably, There is, Always, Almost, Entire, Very, Quite, Already, Surely, Certainly, Obviously, Just, Maybe, Stuff, Things, Got, Seemed, But, Like

Cutting out the majority of these words will make your prose tighter. Tight prose = good prose.

A’ight, Folks. That’s all I got for you. Before you leave, waddle on over to the comments and tell me about your own editing process. I love contrasting and comparing different styles!

18 Comments

  1. C.S.Wilde on July 31, 2015 at 1:49 pm

    Yes. Yes to this. : )

  2. Noelle Granger on July 31, 2015 at 2:05 pm

    Came at a good time, Anthony. I am starting my first rewrite. Luckily I have had ten people in two different critique groups who went over that first draft with a fine tooth comb and found stuff for me, to add to what I am finding and changing myself. Can’t praise these groups enough.
    I think these posts of yours are worthy of you tube videos? Have you considered that?

    • antvicino@gmail.com on July 31, 2015 at 2:08 pm

      Actually I have been toying with the idea of doing a video tutorial in the near future. Still hashing out the details of what all that would entail. I’d really like to get my hands on a talented animation artist and do an animated tutorial with voice-over. I’ll work on it and see what I can come up with! 🙂

  3. Phoebe Darqueling on July 31, 2015 at 2:35 pm

    This is a great article, and extremely well-timed for me. I am about to finish my first manuscript and I was wondering what my plan 0′ attack should be vis-a-vis the editing stage. Thanks for providing one!

    • antvicino@gmail.com on August 1, 2015 at 2:24 am

      You’re welcome, Phoebe. Hopefully you gleamed a couple ideas to help focus your efforts in the coming drafts. Stop back in and let us know how it goes!

  4. Mac on July 31, 2015 at 4:02 pm

    This is helpful work, thank you.

    I started off with a feedback swap site. I read a lot of stuff and learned a lot too. Most of the feedback was well meaning with real nuggets of insight. Some was useless because a few people wanted to earn their next review but didn’t put effort into other peoples work. A few were cruel and dismissive [I will not speculate on their parentage here].

    I found a really great editor via a reader who thought my writing was fantastic. However wonderful my words were … significant scope for improvement remained. Even my goals, genre and target audience were scrutinised.

    The first edit made me blink back the tears. If you’ve ever peeled nippy onions you’ll know how my eyes felt.

    I worked through the edits and discovered I’d only just begun. Next, with the costs of editing in mind I found a way to improve my text and started using a Manuscript Editing tool. This isn’t to replace my editor but to improve my drafting process and saves a lot of time.

    However, none of the above have saved me from rereads and reworks. But, two novels in (85K and 95K) and I’m developing a process that suits me … akin to squeezing and toothpaste tube.

    • Anthony Vicino on August 1, 2015 at 2:23 am

      I love the imagery of a toothpaste tube being squeezed likened with developing as a writer. That’s a fantastic way to approach the act of writing. It’s great to see hard work rewarded, eg: your drafting process continues to improve.

      There can some really helpful/wonderful people out there who will provide fantastic feedback. And then there are the jerks. Unfortunately the internet is full of jerks who just want to tear other people down. Sad to say, but it’s the price of doing business online. I’m glad to see it didn’t deter you from your writing though!

  5. M G Kizzia on July 31, 2015 at 7:57 pm

    Check
    Nothing to add…but you need a like button for those who have nothing to add…

    • antvicino@gmail.com on August 1, 2015 at 2:19 am

      I’ll see what I can do about the like button. Unfortunately, when I transferred over to this new site, the like button disappeared. So far I’ve failed to relocate it. Thanks for joining the conversation though!

    • Anthony Vicino on August 2, 2015 at 12:21 pm

      I have resurrected the Like button! Huzzah!

  6. audaciousvagabond on August 2, 2015 at 3:34 pm

    Thank you so much! This post really addressed a lot of problems I didn’t even realise I had. Solid tips, zany humour, stripper-for-hire subplot – 10/10

    • Anthony Vicino on August 2, 2015 at 6:45 pm

      Fantastic! I’m glad the article could be of some help for you! Stop back in and let me know how you progress.

  7. Aaron Fuller on August 13, 2015 at 11:47 pm

    I might try that idea of using a three column journal for edits. How do you bounce back and forth between Word or what publishing software and paper? Also, how did you design that AV on your blog tag–awesome ligature.

    • Anthony Vicino on August 14, 2015 at 3:20 am

      You should definitely try out the edit journal. I find that by actually handwriting them out, you internalize the tweaks that need to be made much better than if you were to simply read them on the computer. Studies support this sort of switching between stimuli, citing that the more feedback loops you can bring into the equation, the more deeply you’ll grasp the information.

      As for switching back and forth between paper and computer, I have a stand on my desk beside my computer that holds everything I’ve handwritten. I keep the journal open to where I need it and glance over occasionally to keep me on track.

      Plus, checking things off the list, and having that list nearby and clearly visible, adds a constant sense of progress which can sometimes be hard to find with writing.

      Give it a shot on your next work and see how it goes. Stop by and let us know how it works out!

      P.S. Scrivener rules, word…(what’s a negative word that rhymes with rules? uh… I dunno, but pretend I came up with something witty.)

  8. Robert Albert on August 15, 2015 at 6:56 am

    “Bettering Your Editing (Writing Workshop)”, makes clear to me, an old young writer, how much I have to learn about the process. I’ll be checking in frequently to pick up more timeless tips on how to effectively transfer my story to the reader’s consciousness! A good story is useless if it doesn’t make the transmission from writer to reader effectively.

    Thanks,
    Bob Albert – RAAlbertArts

    • Anthony Vicino on August 15, 2015 at 3:55 pm

      Glad to hear that, Bob! We’re never too old to learn and improve our craft. Let me know if there are any areas in particular you’re curious to learn about and I’ll do my best to help!

  9. rhythmprism on September 8, 2017 at 1:05 am

    Hand-scratched edits to my first draft are often so byzantine that if I don’t apply them right away, I’ll often forget what I’ve noted. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. Check out one of Dostoevsky’s edits http://www.fyodordostoevsky.com/images/pics/large5th.jpg

    • Anthony Vicino on September 8, 2017 at 10:49 am

      Those edits literally just gave me heart palpitations. Proof that it could always be worse! Thanks for sharing, I’d never seen that before.

Leave a Comment